in

This Blog

Syndication

Ace Davis' Weblog

The First Name in Browns Blogging

August 2007 - Posts

  • THE WORKHORSE, THE SON, & THE STUDENT

    In the wake of the Mike Vick episode, the NFL is kicking off a new series of image ads showing the human side of its players, "to do everything necessary to protect the strength of our brand."
     
    Touching sentiment, no?
     
    So which team's players do they feature on literally half of these 30-second, black-and-white spots? You guessed it. Watch Braylon, Willie, and Brady here.
  • CAN'T HOLD A CANDLE

    What's a blogger fan to do when the defensive line is even more of a liability than the much-discussed quarterback position? I actually hold out more hope for injured Orpheus Roye than I do for Mt. Washington, the oldest and heaviest defender in Browns history. The newcomer Smiths might be halfway solid, but looking at the depth chart, they darn well better be.
     
    Creative blitzing, aggressive fills from the linebacking corps, and a ball-hawking secondary will be required to get this defense off the field. Forcing turnovers will be absolutely essential. The absence of an experienced punt returner won't even be an issue, because I don't see this team prompting many three-and-outs on the opponents' side of the field.
     
    So, I repeat, what's a blogger to do? Conjure up the past, I suppose. Happy birthday today to this trio, all fine defensive linemen from Browns teams of yore:
    • Rob Burnett, 40. No Browns defensive end has been any better since this fifth-rounder from Syracuse wore the brown and orange from 1990-95 and amassed 40.5 sacks.
    • Michael Dean Perry, 42. Five-time Pro Bowler, 47.5 sacks as a Brown, by far a better player than his more famous big brother.
    • Derrell Palmer, 85. I did a few quick checks, so I'm hoping and assuming that he's still kicking. The TCU All-American was a starting tackle on some dominant championship defenses from 1949-53.


     
  • THE BOTCHED BUT BENEFICIAL BENCHING

    'Twas an interesting, enigmatic choice by Romeo to bench Wheelie at the outset of Saturday's exhibition at Denver. 
     
    One Watercooler poster heard radio analyst Doug Dieken say that "Crennel is disciplining Winslow for mental mistakes last week."
     
    Beat writer Jeff Schudel reports thusly:
    The easy conclusion is Winslow was being punished for some rule infraction, perhaps missing curfew or being tardy to a team meeting, but Crennel said Winslow did not do anything wrong, that he kept Winslow on the sideline because he wanted to see Heiden in the starting lineup.

    The explanation seems flimsy.
    True. But it's at least not inconsistent with Dieken's reported remark, which I take to mean that Crennel pinned some of the blame for the Detroit debacle on the weakest part of Wheelie's game: his brain. Anderson's interception near the goal line, where Wheelie and Steve Heiden were both in the same zone, may be the most tangible example.
     
    So after one quarter of exile, Wheelie takes the field as the Browns go for it on fourth-and-two. Twitch. False start. Time to punt. Hmmm.
     
    This takes nothing away from his later game-leading achievements, including a superb catch up the seam. Winslow's hands and heart are truly remarkable. But it's Romeo who called attention to the mental issue by his conspicuous method of message-sending. It's a curious decision: did he really think the media and fans would buy that lame explanation and leave it alone?
     
    The underlying if unstated point is not without merit. For all his talent as a pass-catcher and his courage in rehabbing what could have been devastating injuries, Wheelie has always had his problems getting lined up right, running the correct routes, and avoiding penalties.
     
    Last season, he was flagged seven times, tied with Hank Fraley for second most on the team, behind Kevin Shaffer's nine. (I include declined or offset fouls in my totals.) For the record, that's two for pass interference, two personal fouls, one taunting call, one hold and a false start.
     
    No one else had more than four. By contrast, the Detroit Diva, for all his troubles last year, was at least never penalized by the refs.
     
    The Browns and their new offense will have their share of struggles this season, so anything they can do to prevent their stars from shooting their own feet, no matter how clumsily handled, is a welcome development. 
  • FRASER'S "ABSCESS"

    We all know how the Browns underplay and underreport injuries. Do I really need to review the litany of disappointing news and miscommunications? Well, perhaps I'm sensitized to this issue because I recently wrote an article (to appear in the October OBR magazine) detailing the Browns' history with staph infections, but witness this news from Monday for future reference:
    Defensive lineman Simon Fraser, meanwhile, has an abscess. Crennel said he'll miss "a couple days."
    This snippet from a medical encyclopedia is worth noting here:
    Many different agents cause abscesses. The most common are the pus-forming (pyogenic) bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus, which is nearly always the cause of abscesses under the skin.
    If that turns out to be Fraser's issue, expect him to miss at least two weeks, which would further hamper the already thin rotation at defensive end. It would also be the sixth case of staph among Browns players since 2003.
     
    Update: After listening to Romeo's presser yesterday, he somewhat sputteringly specified that Fraser "has an abscess on his buttocks in the back that he had to have removed, so he'll miss a couple days and then we'll get him back." That would greatly reduce the likelihood of a lesion caused on the football field itself. Quoting the medical encyclopedia further: "Abscesses near the large bowel, particularly around the anus, may be caused by any of the numerous bacteria found within the large bowel." In any case, if I were a Browns player, I'd be mighty careful in the whirlpool and training room. 
     
    And by the way, has Brady Quinn's name been officially changed to "the young quarterback?" Is this just Romeo-speak or a brilliant trademarking scheme in the making?
  • LIKE 1984

    According to the ratings system devised over at the P-F-R blog, the 1984 Browns rank first among all teams since 1970 in the inequality of their offense and defense, among teams with better defenses than offenses. In other words, no team since the merger had a better defense compared to their offense -- or, more accurately, a worse offense compared to their defense -- than the '84 Browns.
     
    Of all the possible things to blog about, why did this catch my eye? It because of the potential parallels between that team and today's:
    • The '84 Browns were quarterbacked by a former mid-round draft pick, Paul McDonald, who displayed flashes of ability but a propensity to alternately eat the ball and miss receivers disturbingly often. He was eventually succeeded by a first-round blue-chipper of local origins.
    • That team had a very iffy receiving corps, with the exception of a premiere tight end.
    • The offensive line figured to be a strength, with several established veterans, but for one reason or another, neither the rushing attack nor the pass blocking was up to par.
    • The team ran a 3-4 defense whose greatest strength was the linebacking corps.
    • A young, aggressive secondary started to emerge and show tremendous promise.
    • Of course, that team got off to a tragically slow 1-8 start, and the head coach was replaced mid-season by the defensive coordinator.
    I'm certainly hoping that this analogy won't go that far. That Jamal Lewis has more in the tank than Mike Pruitt did. That Braylon Edwards can exceed the receiving totals of the top two, and maybe three or four, of the '84 WRs. And that the QBs, however that plays out, won't get sacked 55 times.
     
    Perhaps 1985 will prove to be the better point of comparison (though I hoped for that before, to no avail). The rookie gunslinger took over midseason. The rushing attack combined power and agility. A new O-line (only the center was a returning starter from the previous year) took shape. And they beat all three division opponents at home, sneaking into the playoffs for the first of a memorable five-year run.
     
     
  • WILLIE OR WON'T HE

    It's mid-August, and the familiar dropping of flies has hit Berea. Tweaks, dings, bumps: the shorthand euphemisms for sprains, tears, soft tissue damage, concussions, and the like.
     
    Most noteworthy this week is the attrition in the linebacking corps. When the Official $ite features Chaun Thompson, the all-but-forgotten Butch-era reach now entering the last year of his rookie contract, you know something's up.
     
    Matt Stewart is gone for the season with a torn labrum. Willie McGinest had back surgery and will miss at least six weeks. And Antwan Peek has been limited by a hamstring injury. According to Romeo's first depth chart, that leaves slow-developing pass-rusher David McMillan and special-teams demon Jason Short as the only other outside LBs to complement Gumby.
     
    No wonder Chaun is being moved back outside. I've even heard that Andra Davis has taken a few practice reps at OLB recently.
     
    My point is not to bemoan injuries or suggest that there is a severe depth problem at OLB. Other positions are far thinner.
     
    Rather, I see a tough decision coming with regard to McGinest. Six weeks, the best-case scenario, would take us to Week 3 of the regular season. It's more realistic to assume that he would not be ready to play at a level that significantly improves the team until after the Week 7 bye.
     
    We all know that the first month of the season, with home games against each division foe, is absolutely crucial to the direction of the franchise. Can the team afford to hold an active roster spot open for a 35-year-old linebacker coming off disc surgery?
     
    "We're going to try and get him ready to play the rest of the season, but backs are fickle sometimes," quoth Romeo on Thursday.
     
    When healthy, McGinest certainly remains capable of contributing to the run defense, a chronically weak area. But which bubble player will need to be cut in order to hold a spot for his uncertain return? Or put it this way: which rookie draft pick will not even make the team so that an injured veteran might contribute down the road?
     
    In the face of the front-loaded schedule and the need to develop emerging talent, putting Willie on injured reserve before final cutdowns seems advisable. And given the team's favorable salary cap situation this year, if his recovery doesn't go well, it would be worth pursuing an injury settlement to ensure that he is not a financial liability going into 2008.
     
    This issue may prove to be yet another point of contention between Romeo, who often favors vets and has a long history with McGinest in particular, and GM Phil Savage, who would understandably want to give his own draft picks -- guys like CB/PR Brandon McDonald and DE Chase Pittman -- as many opportunities as possible.
     
    It's unfortunate, because I had high hopes a year ago that McGinest would be an impact player and leader on an emerging defense, and things have gone sour. Many Browns fans are downright hostile toward the man, but I'm not close enough to judge whether Willie's problems in Cleveland have been purely physical.
     
    Ultimately, it's Phil's call, and if he shelves McGinest  -- and even "liberates" him from the final year of his deal in '08 -- I wouldn't argue a bit.
     
     
  • SMART ENOUGH?

    Quote du jour: 
    "I don't think if you go back over the last two-and-a-half years, we could've extended Orpheus Roye, Andra Davis, Leigh Bodden, Steve Heiden as recently as this year, guaranteed more money to any rookie lineman in the history of the league, paid for LeCharles Bentley, went out and got Eric Steinbach, actually split the difference and added a little bit on Eric Wright to get him in on time, and then all of a sudden the Browns are gonna shift gears and try to extract blood from the quarterback that we picked, that we say is gonna be the face of the franchise, that we say is the future of this team -- it makes no sense, it's not logical, and I think people are smart enough to figure that out."
    --Phil Savage, today on WTAM
     
    I'm not going to elaborate much on the Quinn holdout. I have no inside dish, and everyone seems to have their own opinion already. But Savage is obviously mighty irked at Tom Condon's negotiating method, which includes an unhealthy dose of delay.
     
    As for Quinn himself, I hope he does eventually learn the difference between his best interest and that of his agent. I also can't imagine that he's doing himself any favors whatsoever by speaking into a microphone owned by Channel 19, the archenemy of Browns owner Randy Lerner. 
2007 MediaTNG, LLC
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems