in

The Berea Chronicles

Why The Rush, Phil?

Perhaps the biggest news coming out of Phil Savage's otherwise ho-hum press conference was the general manager confirming a new deal is in the works for Romeo Crennel.

Or they're gonna do "right" by the head coach.  Or however Savage couched talk of an extension/raise/new contract.

I've thought about this and thought about this and thought about this, and kept coming back to the same word.

Why?

What's the rush in re-upping a 20-28 head coach with two years remaining on his original five-year deal?

Wouldn't that be akin to giving a teenager the keys to a new ride--as a reward for being sober one weekend--after he had drunkenly totaled the family Volvo twice the past two weekends?

Then it hit me. 

Savage, and by extension owner Randy Lerner, have no choice.  AFC North rival Baltimore's interest in offensive coordinator Rob Chudzinski, and his subsequent contract extension, is forcing the organization's hand.

Simply put, the club could not afford to have a head coach, one who was on a very hot seat a mere four months ago, working on a contract that expires a full two years before a coordinator who's become the toast of Browns Town and is widely viewed as a head coach-in-training.

You cannot have a hot coordinator--one who grew up loving the Cleveland Browns no less--signed beyond a head coach who, despite his team's 2007 success, is still looked at with a very wary eye by the fans and some media alike.

And, yes, by some in the very organization that is about to reward him.

I have heard from numerous people that Crennel's agent and his working the press last week in regards to a new contract did not sit well with both Savage and Lerner.  In not so many words, it pissed them off.

Now, a few days later, it's off to the negotiating table for the re-work of a current deal that wouldn't put the coach in lame-duck status until September of 2009?  The very same head coach who, in January of this past year, was the beneficiary of the sell-job of Savage's life in order to keep "continuity", and RAC's head, from being guillotined?

In the end, I guess it doesn't matter fiscally whether or not Crennel gets an extension.  It doesn't count against the salary cap, and, as Lerner showed with E Pluribus Butchum, he's not afraid to throw money at Dead Coaches Walking out the front doors of Berea.

The perception will be that continuity remains; the contract extension--if worked out--will show the full faith and backing of the Browns' organization.

The reality, though, is that Crennel is one sub-par year away from being right back where he was before the start of the season.

Extension or no extension.

And especially if the coaching staff's new Golden Boy keeps the offense humming.

Comments

 

Browns49 said:

This article disrespects what RAC did this year.  Continuity works.  Just ask the Steelers. The 20-28 complaint of RAC's record is bogus. This is the first year since the !999 return that the Browns have a roster that even resembles an NFL team. Next year, the schedule gets tougher.  For this reason alone, the record probably won't match this year's. But that's no reason for axing RAC next year.

We've seen many offensive and defensive coordinators flop as head coaches over the years.  A good coordinator does not necessarily make a good head coach.  How many Super Bowl rings does Chud have?  When he gets to RAC numbers, maybe then we can talk about his head coaching suitability.

January 12, 2008 12:12 PM
 

Dawg57 said:

RAC is a joke and Savage knows it. He'd like nothing more than for RAC to want out of Cleveland. This guy is the worst coach we've ever had. There was a reason no other team hired him as a HC. If he was such a Defensive "Guru" then why didn't any other team ever hire him as a HC? The sooner his fat ass is out of Cleveland the better. What a Bafoon.

January 13, 2008 5:14 AM
 

salesman217 said:

Buffoon you say? Wow.  That's quite a charge.  Oh well.  Everyone has their opinion.  It's really hard to say who or what behind the scenes is responsible for the success the Browns have had this year.  Obviously, the work Phil has done building the roster has been key.  Steinbach, Thomas, Fraley, Shaffer are all Savage acquisitions as are Jamal Lewis, Braylon Edwards, and Joe Jurevicius.  Even the fact that Winslow was not tossed out on his ear after the motorcycle debacle speaks volumes to the job Phil has done.

But someone has to manage all those personalities.  It's especially tough during the rebuilding phase.  I don't think RAC's character/personality traits can be discounted in this matter.  The old man's ability to engender commitment and loyalty among the players despite the team having tremendously disappointing seasons should not be dismissed.

Is RAC the best Xs and Os guy in the world? Who knows?  Is he the best in game strategist to ever grace the sidelines.  Probably not.  But for the rebuilding job that had to be done after Butch Davis left Berea as emotionally wrecked as he was, Romeo Crennel was the man for the job.  Is he Bill Belichek?  Probably not.  But with right coordinators in place I believe this team will keep believing and keep moving in the right direction.

January 13, 2008 12:02 PM
 

BrownPT said:

Today's Pro Football is differant than 10 years ago.

A Head coach today has to manage todays players oppposed to how player were coached 10 years ago.

Vince Lombardie coaching style would not make  it  in todays  era as a head couch. Just look at Bilick head coach of the Ravansor Lewis of the Bengals. The can't manage their players. RAC, Belicak, Gibs, Dungey and Holgram know how to manage players.

January 14, 2008 12:11 PM
 

Hamster said:

Today's Pro Football may be somewhat different but players respect winning period. Mumbles in NE hardly coddles anyone. Looks like the coach know for being a hard ass is also doing ok with the NY Giants too. Holgram is also known as a hard liner. Great coaches are great coaches and Lombardi would have done just fine in todays NFL. Its not the style but the substance behind the coach.

Players like anyone gravitate to those who win. Had we lost this year to Cincy and Derek and Chud not have made the difference, RACs would have lost the club period.  Good stuff as always John. A HC needs to be more than a guidence councilor. RAC was lucky he had enough talent in both coaches and players on the offense.

January 21, 2008 11:24 AM

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Add
2007 MediaTNG, LLC
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems