in

This Blog

Syndication

News

Blogging the Cleveland Browns plus other Cleveland-area blather, plus other blather about other things.

Dawghouse Blog

Blogging the Cleveland Browns plus other Cleveland-area blather, plus other blather about other things.

July 2006 - Posts

  • Camp Blather

    Got to camp for the Saturday morning session and had the distinct pleasure of bring my almost-2-years-old daughter. It was cool. I always love making training camp stop and this was no exception, though I probably watched less football than in years past since I was more interested in watching my daughter watch practice. For what it's worth, she was digging it and even clapped when others cheered. On one occasion she even mustered a, "Good job," or what passes for it. Pretty cool.

    My only observations. 1) Kellen Winslow looks ripped, though I still think he's going to be a good player based on speed and agility, not his size, which seems more Aaron Shea than Antonio Gates. 2) Dorsey just doesn't look like a guy I'd want starting. Let's just get this over with and sign Vinny. Vinny can be #2, and Anderson can be a longer-term development guy. 3) The locker room sale looked awesome. Too bad the line was so long that there was no way I was waiting in it with my kid. I really wanted to get an orange belt. 4) Frye still doesn't look like a practic player, but he seemed much more comfortable than last year's camp. 5) Jurevicius looked great. The guy is a great athlete, despite the prevailing rep that he's a possesion receiver. 6) It was hot. 7) I love just walking down Beech street and the whole orange stripes in the road. It's sweet.

    I really wanted to watch the defensive players but wasn't near enough. It sounds like the competition at linebacker is getting spirited between Jackson and Thompson, and Leon Williams is a player. Without a doubt, I'm most excited about how this defense could shape up. In another year give us another DE and a free safety and we should be pretty damn good.



    I wanted to post on Bentley on Friday but MuniLot.com seemed to be down. Oh well. All I can say is that it sucks so freaking bad and it makes this team's ability to withstand another OL injury very tenuous. Maybe the fact that it happened so early in camp will lessen the blow. For us fans, at least we won't miss great play at center since we haven't seen it for so many years.

    Ryan Tucker's possible knee scoping. Just do it. We need him healthy for the regular season. Let Chambers or whoever play all camp. That seems to be the best longer-term scenario.

    It's good to hear that Bentley is, reportedly, eager to start rehab. Man, it's got to be hard to be positive after such an injury. I'll be rooting for him hard and can't wait for the day he suits up for real, even if it will be a year later than we'd all hoped.



    It's cool to see Braylon apparently ahead of schedule. We need a little hope, though I don't see how anything could fully compensate for Bentley. If it was up to me I'd play Edwards sparingly starting with the second preseason game. And plan for him to be a bench player for the first couple weeks of the regular season.


    It's almost pathetic to say -- but I am ready for some preseason football.


    Let's hear it for Summertime weekend house projects. I hear it was a gorgeous weekend. All I know is that my daughter's bedroom is looking pretty good after a FRI/SAT/SUN of ripping off wallpaper, spackling, priming, painting, etc.


    It is freaking hot out. I'm trying to prepare for a half-marathon or marathon (depending on my mood and beer consumption) and, due to the above mentioned projects, absolutely and to get in 8 miles today at lunch. Fricking stupid. Let me tell you, it is hot.
    Posted Jul 31 2006, 05:07 PM by MikeB with no comments
    Filed under:
  • Training Camp Is On

    The most promising thing I've read about training camp so far is that Frye is 20 pounds heavier than last year. That's crazy -- it's not easy to gain 20 pounds of good weight in an offseason, is it?


    Sounds like DeMario Minter is out for the year after having some work on his knee. That sucks. While I didn't expect Minter to be an immediate impact player, he sounds like a true special-teams/depth guy who could become the replacement for a guy like McCutcheon. That can't be happening for at least a year or two.


    Looking through the training camp photos from Day 1 over at Cleveland.com, I can't help it... I'm excited. It's cool seeing Winslow in Browns uniform again. And it's awesome seeing Joe Jurevicius and LeCharles Bentley suiting up for us.


    I think it is damn cool that Randy Lerner may purchase Aston Villa, though recent reports sound like maybe he's souring on the deal. But I'm daydreaming anyway of the Browns having a sister-team in the Premiership. And if Lerner is this serious now, it seems likely he'll jump in at some point over the next few years.


    Jerry Porter is being shopped by the Raiders, and he's demanding a trade too. That's makes Porter and Ashley Lelie as potentially starter-quality wide outs who are available. At first I thought, "Cool, maybe this depresses the Broncos asking price for Lelie and the Browns snag him for Lee Suggs." But then I read the Raiders are asking for two #1 picks for Porter. That is just laughable.


    Travis Hafner on Casey Blake's inside-the-park homer: "Any self-respecting power hitter would have stopped at third." Hehe. Say waht you want about the crappy season the Indians have had, but I still like the team and most of the players on it. I don't feel like I'm rooting for a bunch of jerkoffs. But man, they better get it together next season or else we won't see these "core" players together any more.


    No, I'm not going to make any attempt to do daily blog entries regarding training camp. Even I can't think of that much blather.
    Posted Jul 27 2006, 10:01 AM by MikeB with 1 comment(s)
    Filed under:
  • Top Ten Things to Watch in Browns Camp That Might Actually Be Meaningful

    I think I've been blogging something along these lines each year for about four years now. And to be honest, I'm not sure I've written anything particularly insightful or even accurate because I've never gone back after camp or after the season to compare. I'm not saying I've been woefully wrong. On the contrary, I'm saying that anything written about camp and the preseason before the preseason actually starts is destined to be forgotten by the end of August. But if you are reading this, I can only presume you are like me and are looking for some meaningless speculation on that which is probably unknowable anyway. Ah, the luxury and the pleasure! So without further ado.... the Top Ten Things to Watch in Browns Camp That Might Actually Be Meaningful. *0. There is no Charlie Frye here. No Ruben Droughns. No offensive line. Hardly a mention of anyone over 225 pounds. Nothing about the coaches. Nothing about the playcalling. Nothing about defensive schemes. Nothing about special teams. Because anything you see about that stuff is totally meaningless in camp.
    1. The physicality of Kellen Winslow. Everyone is worried about whether Winslow will get his speed and agility back. I am too, but in camp I think the best measure of where he's at will be how aggressive he is in contact drills. Does he block aggressively? Does he meet tacklers with power in the preseason? Does he shed defenders near the line of scrimmage? If he looks good doing those things, I think he's got a good start.
    2. Sean Jones and Brodney Pool. I actually don't have much doubt that Pool will be a real player as long as he's healthy. We'll see. Jones, on the other hand, needs to show he belongs in the mix as a possible starter. And the bottom line is that the team needs one of these guys to pan out, and for it to happen this season. My guess is Pool is named the starter a couple weeks before the end of camp. But I'd be quite pleased if it were Jones that emerged.
    3. The backup wide receivers. This is my pick for the most important position that will get little attention. Let's face it: Braylon Edwards isn't returning until mid-season, and is unlikely to play great until 2007. That means we absolutely need contributions from our 3rd and 4th receivers, whomever they will be. The only real candidates to me are Jackson Frisman, Travis Wilson, and Josh Cribbs. It's Jackson who the team is relying on the most, and he did show some real promise at times last season. Wilson is an unknown to me and sounds like he need to develop, but that doesn't mean he can't be a contributor. And Cribbs looked really raw in 2005 as a WR and hopefully he's gotten more polished, but personally I'm wondering if he can be used creatively to effect.
    4. The return of Gary Baxter. We're really relying on Baxter this season. In fact, a strong season from Baxter could have a nice trickle-down effect on the defense. If Baxter looks recovered and ready to roll, we should feel quite good about the cornerback position. Baxter and Bodden won't scare anyone, but while they may not get a lot of press they are likely to earn a lot of respect.
    5. The linebackers. There's so much going on here that this might be further up the list. But there's only so much you can judge in the preseason. Davis and McGinest are not guys to watch. Neither are veteran backup-types like Stewart. It's the newer blood like Wimbley, Thompson, Jackson, Speegle, McMillan, and Williams that hold much of the promise of these Browns.
      • Wimbley - just be in the right place. Does he position himself properly on runs to the outside? Can he stay with a tight end or fullback in pass coverage? Does he look like he can be a bit of a pass rushing threat? We won't get all the answers of course, but we should have a good feel for how much he'll play as a rookie.
      • Thompson is moving inside and is pencilled in as the starter for the moment. But there's a lot of competition here, and Thompson has been pretty inconsistent. One thing is for sure -- Thompson is very athletic and has the speed to cover a lot of ground. But he'll have to show better instincts to earn a starting spot.
      • D'Qwell Jackson is a rookie that has got me excited. I think he's exactly what we need in the middle of the defense -- an undersized dude that plays his butt off to make up for it. My money is on Jackson to beat out Thompson, but I hope Thompson proves to be difficult to unseat cause Jackson sounds like the type of guy to raise his game.
      • Speegle/McMillan are back-up guys at best, and they might not both even be on the team. Last year they looked like rookies. This year, I'm hoping the step from start-to-backup isn't so noticable when watching the preseason games.
      • Leon Williams is described as a talent but also a character risk. OK. I get the feeling Williams was drafted with an eye towards possible being a contributor in 2007 or 2008. We'll see. Even if Williams looks good in the preseason I expect Crennel to make him wait for playing time. So the next 6-7 weeks are when we'll get our best look at him. It'd be nice to get the impression he could turn into a player. If we're sticking with the 3-4, it'd be nice to have to establish a stable of promising backups. After all, in coming years other teams will be raiding our LB core in free agency...
    6. Ken Dorsey. I think we needed a veteran, especially one who seems like a good mentor to Frye. Dorsey, whatever his strengths, is not that guy. In some ways I most fear Dorsey playing well in the preseason and fooling the FO into thinking he might be the answer... Ugh, the whole situation scares me. I guess I hope he either looks good enough to win me over, or looks terrible enough to get the boot while there is still time.
    7. Jerome Harrison. The write-ups on this guy excite me, but I take that with a grain of salt. Still, if Harrison looks good I think this changes the running back situation significantly for the next year or two. And it's likely that Harrison would take someone else's roster spot.
    8. Lawrence Vickers. The Browns aren't exactly hurting for a fullback, but it would be nice to have one who could be more of a factor with the ball in his hands. If Vickers proves to be that guy, it means McIntyre is cut. And it also could affect the RB situation since Vickers sounds like he could lineup in either position.
    9. Suggs & Green. 2006 is the year where something gives with one of these guys. Maybe it's a long-rumored trade for Ashley Lelie (which I am all for, btw). Maybe one of them just gets cut. As it stands going in to camp, William Green seems to have the most value to the team since he's shown he can serve as a backup and carry the load for weeks at a time.
    10. Oshinowo. Everyone is assuming he will backup at NT and learn from Ted Washington, myself included. But it's worth watching to see if that hold true, because if it doesn't the Browns are going to be this at NT again this year (no offense to Ethan Kelly...).
    Posted Jul 26 2006, 01:20 PM by MikeB with no comments
    Filed under:
  • Fantasy Preview: AFC West I & II

    DENVER BRONCOS
    I still harbor a dislike of the Broncos. And in fantasy football I harbor a dislike of Mike Shanahan because, other than looking like an angry uncle, he has proven to be the bain of fantasy teams everywhere with his RB-by-committee approach. How can a team so consistently productive on offense be so consistently frustrating for fantasy players? It's Shanahan. Anyway... this year the Broncos get Javon Walker and a usual cast of characters at RB. Jake Plummer is still the QB, even though Jay Cutler is now waiting in the wings. The defense should still be solid, despite the fact it will likely start a defensive line composed entirely of ex-Browns Warren, Brown, Myers, and Lang. Amazing. I predict a 9-7 type year, mostly due to Plummer.

    Jake Plummer has never been a favorite of mine. He's not that bad, particularly for the first 80% of the season. He could start for you, but he's a better guy to have as a backup. The problem isn't so much Plummer's unpredictable play (though that is a problem), it's that the Bronco's gameplans don't always give him lots of chances to throw. So some weeks you could get nothing. Thus, backup status. And this year, it's possible the playoff beat-down from the Steelers and the drafting of Cutler could affect him.

    Javon Walker is a jerk, the new TO, whatever. He paid his karmic price by getting hurt last year. It remains to be seen whether he's still in depth. I think he'll have a very good year because he's a very good football player. Thus, he's a top 10 receiver and I'd rank him just behind a guy like Chad Johnson.

    Rod Smith is still playing, and still worth drafting late. You could do far worse when looking for a bye-week replacement than to plug Smith in there. But if he's more than your 5th (ok, maybe 4th in a pinch) receiver, you have problems. You want to remember he's still playing and draft him l-a-t-e.

    Ashley Lelie is supposed to get traded. If he doesn't, his value is minimal unless there's an injury. If he does get traded, it will all depend on where he goes. He's even been rumored to go to Cleveland for a guy like Suggs. We'll see. Lelie seems like a headcase and apparently he would not fit in with Javon walker. Whatever the case, Lelie is a decent deep threat and has had some positive moments, but he's still too Quincy Morgan for my tastes. If/when he gets traded he's a 3rd/4th receiver and his potential for good numbers is offset by his attitude.

    Tatum Bell supposedly has the inside track to be the starter. He should be the starter, but who knows what Shanahan is doing. Don't draft before round 5. And draft 1-2 sure-thing guys first. Then take a shot if that's your thing. Just remember and expect the starting Broncos RB to suddenly get switched out of the lineup at some point.

    Ron Dayne is a very late pick. His upside is limited but does exist. I'd draft more as possible trade ammunition if he has a big game than for anything else.

    KANSAS CITY CHIEFS
    They've said goodbye to Dick Vermeil and hello to Herm Edwards. To me, that is a bad sign. Edwards oversaw a bunch of crappy fantasy seasons with the Jets, and the only exceptions were some good seasons by Curtis Martin. There's more talent in KC than in New York. But I have doubts Edwards can keep the air game going well enough to keep defenses from gearing up to stop the run. Besides Edwawrds, the Chiefs seem to be treading water with a slowly aging lineup that that's be not-good-enough for a long time now. For fantasy football think it's reasonable to start wondering when there will be an offensive drop off in KC. Larry Johnson is a stud, but we already know what having a stud RB means in KC.

    Larry Johnson is a top 3 pick. He looked that good last year. And he is guaranteed to get the ball a ton behind a very good KC o-line. As far as top picks go, it's a safe one. The only question is whether new coaches and another year will change the opportunities Johnson gets.

    Trent Green still is a good director of the offense. I'm more worried about what that offense will look like. Unless Samie Parker suprises, Green only has Gonzalez to throw to. I'm staying away from Green because is upside isn't there and Edwards has brought QBs nothing but bad luck.

    Tony Gonzalez is probably the #2 TE behind Gates. But he's no longer a clear cut above the pack. I wouldn't at all be suprised if he doesn't finish in the top 3 in TE scoring. That doesn't mean he isn't the #2 TE in the draft -- but it means you shouldn't burn a 3rd round pick on him anymore. He's more like a 5th or 6th rounder. At that price you'll be happy with his performance even if he isn't carrying your team.

    Priest Holmes is reportedly not playing this year. I wouldn't draft him if he was, just because he clearly would be the #2 guy. It's a shame though -- hopefully he's back in '07.

    Eddie Kennison puts up okay numbers year after year. He's a nice spot starter and very draftable, but his upside is only as a 3rd WR. So pay accordingly.

    Samie Parker is the guy everyone will watch to see if he becomes an impact WR. The Chiefs have needed one for years. I doubt it's Parker. I'd draft late if he falls.

    OAKLAND RAIDERS
    Had a terrible 2006. They've replaced Kerry Collins with Aaron Brooks, but otherwise the offensive personnel is pretty much the same. I think it's safe to say that this franchise is in disarray and will continue to be until after its owner passes away and, most likely, a few lawsuits are settled. Until then it seems like moves are made without much regard for actually building a franchise. But from such chaos comes reckless play, and from that often comes players putting up stats even while their team sucks. While I'd be hesitant to invest top draft picks in this team, I wouldn't be shy in picking Raiders to flesh out a roster.

    Randy Moss is stil a very good receiver, but he dissappointed last year and seems to have lost some focus. Perhaps Kerry Collins was to blame. I do expect Aaron Brooks to help somewhat and for Moss to get more up-for-grabs type balls being thrown his way. But Moss is no longer a second round pick. He's a third rounder, and I would rate him in there with a number of other guys. Still, the raiders may be forced to throw a lot and Moss should at least get a lot of chances.

    Aaron Brooks is a fantasy stud compared to Collins. And he could be a great backup-type since he'll definitely have the tools around him to produce big games and is not shy about running for yards. I like him in 2006. The downside is that in real life he sort of sucks and will be prone to inconsistency. And if things go south, he'll be the first guy benched. But if you prefer to think positive, Brooks is a decent play to rack up garbage time stats.

    LaMont Jordon was a favorite of mine last season. He didn't really dissappoint, but he didn't score much in the early season. Jordan is a good pick this year. He can run well. And he's a nice receiving threat which really helps his stats even when the ground game is stalled. The problem is that RBs don't usually get the garbage time points. He still a fantasy starter however.

    Jerry Porter is finally a viable fantasy prospect after years of being the biggest tease going. He's not a bad guy to take a gamble on, as long as you are prudent and draft Porter along with a host of other possible break-out WRs.

    Curry/Gabriel/Whitted are all possible prospects. But none are worthwhile unless there's an injury. Depending on how the Raiders offense looks, one of these guys could come into play and be a contributor fantasy-wise.

    Justin Fargas was a hot prospect that didn't do much last year. Don't forget about him in Jordan goes down.

    SAN DIEGO CHARGERS
    The Chargers will be pretty interesting. With Rivers taking over at QB there are some definite unknowns. And the WRs look a lot like the Chiefs to me -- somebody has to step up, right? Tomlinson is a top 3 RB. gates is the top TE. And the defense is pretty solid.

    LaDainian Tomlinson is a favorite of mine. I like him because he's a great runner, and has become as very good receiver. He'd be the guy I'd pick at the top of a draft, but having Rivers at QB means he could face more 8-man fronts. Basically, Rivers has to play decent for LT to have a monster year.

    Phillip Rivers is among the most intriguing QBs this year. He's got no starting experience and looked pretty bad last year in spot duty. But he's had two years on the bench to get ready for the NFL, and he supposedly has the necessary talent. And most importantly, he's got a good team around him that should put h im in position to succeed. I wouldn't draft him as a starter, but I'd draaft him with an eye towards sticking him in my starting lineup if things roll his way. The problem is that until the last couple years Drew Brees didn't put up great numbers in this offense. But I'm willing to bet that with Antonio Gates and LT's ability to take short receptions to the house that Rivers' downside isn't too great. If you can get him as your second QB later in the draft, I think he's worth a gamble.

    Antonio Gates has taken over for Tony Gonzalez as the best TE in football. He will probably go in the later 3rd round. I think 4th round is more appropriate, but he'll be gone. Personally, I'm not drafting Gates because there's a lot of promising tight ends who could make some contribution, and Gates does have to deal with a first-year starter at QB. That means there could be some roller-coaster stretches for Gates.

    McCardell is not a bad option as a backup 3rd WR. He inevitably will have some big games, lots of solid games, and the occasional disappearing act. The problem is he won't get a lot of TDs. Which means you don't want to start him very often. Draft in the 8th.

    Eric Parker is an okay gamble later. You'd be looking for a good backup contributor, which he could emerge as. 10+ round though.

    Aaron Shea is a lucky man. He's been a decent receiving TE. He's keeping his career rolling. And now he gets to live it up in San Diego. Shea is not a fantasy factor but I am including him here as a reminder that real life matters too.

    Posted Jul 26 2006, 08:24 AM by MikeB with 1 comment(s)
    Filed under:
  • Seasonal Notes, and the "Cash-Flush Rookie" Factor

    I think one thing PFT.com is failing to consider when talking about the "guaranteed money" flaw is that lots of NFL players do stupid things with their money, particularly top rookie draft picks who are flush with cash after spending a few years living in a dorm room and eating off the meal card at the cafeteria. So, if Alex Smith's 4 million in 2010 equates to only about 3.275 mil, that might no be so bad if the percentage of wasteful big-time-rookie spending averages, say, 40%. Even if that factor decreases the longer a player is in the league (and presumably gets a little more attuned to money matters), one could presume that your average rookie's 4 million in 2006 might equal significantly less in 2010 once all the Bentleys are paid for. I like Alex Smith might be better off, whether he knows it or not.


    The Browns have now signed
    all rookies except Travis Wilson. Cool. I'd expect Wilson to sign ASAP too, since he's the guy who most needs to get into camp on time. Overall, this sounds good -- little drama in signing draft picks is a nice thing for a team that needs bodies. It will be particularly interesting to see how the new blood at linebacker shakes out. Let's get it on...


    The PD's Bob Livingston is quick to
    pour cold water on the cautious optimism surrounding Charlie Frye and the QB position. This seems sort of lame to me. I agree with everything Livy says except his attitude, which is one of presumed failure. At this point I don't see any harm in expecting moderate success from Frye. The fact is that the Browns do have a better team around him than they've had for probably any QB in the last 8 years except maybe Couch in 2001, and that's even debatable. But Livy takes it to an absurd extreme, coming to the conclusion that ignorant Joe Montana comparisons are inevitable, which is flat out stupid. Once again, Livingston mistakes fans enthusiasm, enjoyment and simple fun-loving attitude of Browns fans for fans actual expectations. No wonder he sounds so out of touch. Has he never tailgated after an early season win and high-fived a buddy saying, "We're going to the f'n Super Bowl!" ??? If not, you have to ask yourself whether a Bob Livingston column is at all meaningful to actuals fans of the Browns.


    Meanwhile, Grossi details the Browns
    failings are quarterback since 1999. I think you could argue that the premise is a bit flawed, since even the utmost Couch-hater would allow that having such a poor team around him really hurt the team. In fact, it didn't even allow the Browns for several years to truly get a clear sense whether the guy was any good. And knocking Savage for a poor QB track record is a bit disenguous when I think everyone would agree that the Browns are in a stage where they want to build up the team before investing a high draft pick or a pile of dollars at the QB postion. Grossi even concludes with, "Savage's reputation is on the line." Is it? I think it's on the line if the defense doesn't improve. If the offensive line doesn't get better. But as much as we want him to succeed, Frye is not a make or break deal.


    For anyone even remotely, faintly interested in English soccer, check out a great article on
    picking an English Premiership League club to root for. In the coming years you can bet these games will become more prominent in the US. And now is the time to buy in before you'll have blatantly jumped on a bandwagon. And if you are as annoyed with the @game experience of NFL football (as well as most pro sports), you'll appreciate the article's slant... describing the Middlesbrough club: "One of their fans ran on the field last year and ripped up his season tickets right in front of their coach. True story." I think any decent Browns fan can respect that...


    From the did-I-hear-that-right file: The news that the old Cleveland Greyhound garage is being
    converted into a luxury gay bathhouse strikes me as... just flat out weird. But what is crazy is I heard about it on a local NPR station where they were advertising an upcoming program where they planned to discuss the "risks and benefits of gay bathouses." Don't get me wrong, I don't have a problem with people doing their thing, but, c'mon, you couldn't make this stuff up!


    It's cool to drive home from work along the east shoreway and see the scoreboards being tested in Cleveland Browns Stadium. Although it sort of sucks that what is being tested are the usual in-game promotional and manufactured "go-team-go" pap. That is another matter. What is cool is that football is upon us. Even if it's two months of poor substitutes for actual games-that-matter action.


    This SI Brown preview will tell you nothing you don't already know, except this: "The Browns have played the eventual Super Bowl champion in every season since rejoining the league in 1999. They are 0–9 in such matchups, getting outscored 260–68." Ouch.


    A week before the All-Star break I was allowing the Indians one more stretch of games before agreeing that they were finished in 2006. Well, obviously, they are finished and the season has been a big dissappointment. The fact they didn't measure up to 2005 isn't that suprising, but that they are headed for a sub-.500 finish is. Guys are getting traded and clearly 2006 is now an attempt to check out some minor-leaguers and maybe acquire guys to help in subsequent years. Not what we all wanted to see.

    Still, I think the alarmism I read and hear is premature. The buzz now is how the Indians have so many players who either play out of position or are not very good fielders. While I think that is valid criticism for Victor Martinez, it's not for guys like Peralta, Michaels, Broussard and Boone. Those guys are not great fielders but they are good enough if their bats are solid. And it doesn't speak to all the other dissappointments pitching-wise. I think everyone should shrug their shoulders, so oh well, and still consider that the team is still poised to at least be decent for several years to come. That's the way baseball works sometimes.

  • Fantasy Preview: AFC South Part II

    JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS
    They're getting known for a good defensive front, though their defensive stats are not that great. And Leftwich has played well enough to still be considered an improving young QB. What is most interesting, though, is the offensive depth on the roster. The Jags could be fertile ground for a breakout star, or could spend the year spinning the wheels trying to spreak the ball around. We'll see.

    Byron Leftwich is not a fantasy starter either. (Noticing a pattern? I think there are less good fantasy starters than spots in a league.) That's not to say his stats will be bad. It's just that he'll take you on a ride that might not be very enjoyable, particularly when the Jags get into defensive battles or when the statuesque Leftwich takes a hard shot that take him out of a game. When he plays he'll have his moments and could produce. But I'd pick him as a #2 in rounds 8-10.

    Fred Taylor, I think, still has some kick in him. Unfortunately he no longer has the explosive burst that made him a stud early in his career. Now, he's got to follow blocks. That means he might be a #2 starter for you, but he's not a guy who'll have many huge games. Rank him accordingly, and consider his injury history and the fact that the roster has plenty of other capable backs. That's enough to drop him to the 5th-6th round in my book, but he will probably go sooner.

    Matt jones might have a fantasy impact. He had a pretty good rookie year. I'd take a flyer on him as a 4th WR, but no higher. Even if he plays great he's still on a team that isn't known for offensive fireworks.

    Ernest Wilford is a good backup as well. I think he's underrated too, as he will probably be the go-to guy in this offense.

    Reggie Williams has some name recognition and will get drafted. I think he's strictly a guy you gamble on late in the draft.

    Marcedes Lewis is a highly touted TE prospect. Draft as a backup and hope he takes the NFL by storm. I could forsee the Jags utilizing a great pass-catching TE, if that's what Lewis proves to be.

    David Garrard played well for 6 weeks last year. If he ever started regularly he'd probably be a better pick than Leftwich because Garrard is more likely to pick up rushing points. As it stands, he's a questionable pick. And a certain waiver pickup when Leftwich goes down.

    Maurice Drew is a fast rookie RB. He could do something. But I don't think there's enough playing time available for him to get enough carries. He could open some eyes on ESPN, but probably won't be a weekly fantasy play even in the best of possible scenarios.

    TENNESSEE TITANS
    The Titans are rebuilding and expected to suck. They probably will. Moreover, the situation at RB is crowded. Not good for fantasy players.

    Billy Volek stands a chance of putting up good numbers. QBs on marginal teams often do. Givens and Bennett are decent receivers too. Volek might be a good backup, and a good value pick. But if you are going the Volek-backup route, you should pick another backup who could conceivably play.

    Chris Brown is good when he plays, but he's hurt always. He's a good value pick too, but you can't start a Titans RB until it's clear he starts and the Titans are better than expected. Draft very late.

    Travis Henry is a good player on a bad team. He's no good enough to dominate. he's not good enough to be the clear-cut starter. he might be a decent bye-wekk player if the situation warrants. Otherwise, not worth the effort.

    LenDale White is not gonna help you this year.

    Vince Young might. He could get playing time in the second half, and I think he'll play pretty well. But I'd be afraid to trot him out in games that matter until he shows some pretty amazing abilities as a rookie.

    David Givens thinks he's a #1 WR. We'll see. I would draft as a #3 WR, at best.

    Drew Bennett is an okay spot start if the team doesn't suck. He could have some nice games here and there. That's it.

    Ben Troupe is in the last year of the "maybe he'll be a good TE" stage. The odds seems a little long. He could be had for next to nothing, and is not a back pickup if you have some roster space. But his team and the depth chart conspire against him.

    Erron Kinney will not be a sexy TE pick. But he actually gets the ball a lot and uses his size well to get open. He is not a bad guy to have around. If he was on a better team I think he could be quite a suprise.

    Posted Jul 19 2006, 12:51 PM by MikeB with 1 comment(s)
    Filed under:
  • Fleeing a War Zone

    Definitely not Browns related. If you aren't interested, read no further. I have to get something off my chest regarding the recent Israeli-Hizbollah fighting.

    It certainly looks like a war and it's serious business. But this crap really gets under my skin:

    Many expressed frustration that it had taken the U.S. government so long to get them out of Lebanon while Europeans and Lebanese with foreign passports already have fled by the thousands.
    or
    After criticism from Congress, the State Department said it dropped plans to ask Americans to pay for their rides on commercial vessels.

    That is incredibly lame, and it says something kind of sad about America. You're in a foreign country, a war breaks out, you fear for your life, and on your own you'd happily buy a plane ticket out of the country if only you could. Then your government charters vessels to get you out. It takes nearly a week, yet you are alive and in one piece. The only catch -- you have to pay your way out, though the government will give you free credit and you can pay any time you want at a later date. It sounds like a pretty good f*cking deal to me. Yet people have the balls to complain about the timeline and about the money. That is just pathetic.

    There are a couple things notable about this conflict that underscore my point. 1) For a person in Lebanon during the past week the safest t hing to do has been to stay put, unless you happen to be visiting your friends/relatives in Hizbollah-land in South Beruit or the southern part of the country (and in which case, well, you really should know better). 2) The Israeli bombs are falling either in known Hizbollah areas, on key infrastructure that could be used to re-supply Hizbollah, or some Lebanese government/military offices. While it's debatable whether all such bombings are necessary, what is not debatable is that they are happening and one ought to stay away from those places. It's a freaking war -- and people sound like they're complaining that their hotel room should have had a king bed instead of a queen. 3) The State Department has _always_ asked civilians to repay the costs for emergency flights out of war zones. This isn't new at all. And in fact in most cases the costs have been much higher, running into the tens of thousands for some more remote places. 4) And, from the books I've read, the State Department isn't in the business of bill collecting and a lot of people who can't reimburse the government simply don't. 5) Finally, if you've travelled to Lebanon you surely knew there was a possibility something could happen. Granted, a full-on war wasn't really expected, but no one should be totally suprised. Ignorance does get you sympathy, but it usually does not grant you special privledges. 6) The fact that people are _complaining_ about paying for a boat ride to Cyprus is, to me, evidence that people aren't quite fearing for their lives.

    Maybe we just don't hear the stories of wars past, but it's hard to imagine some earlier generations complaining about such things. I don't remember anyone in the movie Casablanca complaining that they had to pay their own way home. Maybe that scene was left on the cutting room floor, as it should have been.

    Look, I am really, really sympathetic to the fate of Lebanon and to the circumstances that visitors now find themselves and the whole situation is hitting close to home. It breaks my heart to see what is happening. For a long time now I've looked forward to going to Lebanon with my family and have spent a considerable amount of free time reading up and learning about the country. But to see such petty things in the news is disrespectful to the serious of the situation.

    Like stories about the government's "incompetence" after Hurricane Katrina, these stories seem designed to position our government as the entity that ought to always be able to control what is happening, and it apparently doesn't matter if it's a huge natural disaster or a sudden outbreak of war. But if you are looking to your government to be your insurance policy when bad things happen, I guarantee you will be very dissappointed. The fact that the government has took a week to arrange for safe transport out of Beruit and asks citizens to pay their way would seem to be an absurdly trivial complaint. And it makes me feel like Americans are not serious about matters they ought to be.

    Posted Jul 19 2006, 09:03 AM by MikeB with 1 comment(s)
    Filed under:
  • Notes, Fantasy Preview: AFC South Part I

    My new motto regarding the 2006 Bengals: No Sympathy. With their offseason, they really deserve to dissappoint. In fact, if the Browns can manage an early season win over the Bengals, I think the Bengals would be looking at a very dissappointing first month of the season. But it depends more upon Palmer's health than how many players are suspended or in jail.



    Today's "I can't wait for training camp" link: Grossi summarizes various predictions for the Browns 2006 season. Hint -- they are getting better but still won't be very good.



    Wimbley's agents says negotiating a deal for his client "isn't rocket science." I agree 100%, though I wonder if perhaps an agent shouldn't refrain from mentioning that to a reporter.



    If I was a Browns rookie this season I would really want to be signed and and ready for camp. Wimbley and Jackson in particular stand to see a lot of playing time if they are present.



    Fantasy preview is on to the AFC South.

    HOUSTON TEXANS
    I don't think much of the Texans because I don't think much of David Carr. Sure, he's marginally better than Joey Harrington. But when I see him I still don't see a bona fide NFL starter. And that leads to problems for the rest of the offense. This season Eric Moulds joins the Texans and, theoretically, this will help Carr and the offense. I agree, it will help, but not that much. The o-line still can't measure up, Wali Rainer is starting on defense ferchrissakes, and David Carr still sucks.

    David Carr might have some decent games. But he's gonna get killed again due to crappy protection and the fact he hangs on to the ball forever. If Andre Johnson stays healthy, though, Carr could be a middle-of-the-pack fantasy scorer, and without any more upside. Which means he is not worth of a draft pick, and I'd argue not worthy of carrying on your roster.

    Domanick Davis is a fantasy star. He gets the ball a ton and is a good recevier who often gets the "oh crap" dump off pass from Carr. Also there is no backup to threaten him. He's not a dominant runner and the o-line doesn't help him much, but he's able to do damage, in part, by racking up numbers when the Texans are getting beat up. I do wonder what will happen if the Texans are ever a good team. I don't worry about that in 2006, but with the variations of NFL competitiveness I'd worry enough to draft him as a #2 running back, not as a #1.

    Andre Johnson has had some struggles but it still considered very promising. I'd be wary. He sort of has a reputation for being soft, has a bad QB, and the addition of Moulds could cut both ways. Certainly don't draft as a #1 WR, hopefully he's no better than #2 on your roster, and with any luck you can pick him up later as a #3. In fact, John is a fantastic fantasy backup as he is talented enough for some big games. It's just hard to rely on him week after week. I'd say he's a 6th-8th rounder, and somebody else might take him before than and regret it.

    Eric Moulds has name rec, but really he's kind of sucked of late. I'm hoping that kills his draft value because I think he's still a good WR. And if you can get him late in the draft he coujld turn out to be your all-important #3 WR who can spot start during bye weeks or man the flex position depending on your league. Or he could suck and you aren't out much.

    INDIANAPOLIS COLTS
    They are known as a fantasy candy-store but last year was sort of mixed. Manning had a very good but not great year. Harrison was the same for much of the season. Edgerin James had a nice season but not statistically dominant as some people hoped. Only Reggie Wayne met or exceeded expectations. You have to be careful here -- sure the Colts will be top 10 in respective categories, but you don't want to draft too high. The big change this year is the loss of James. That means, maybe, more passing. And the possibility that a fantasy starter will emerge at RB out of Domanick Rhodes, Joseph Addai or maybe even James Mungro.

    Peyton Manning is a stud but he has to have a great year to justify a #1 pick. I don't think he will quite get there. I always thought Manning was great at exploiting a defense that didn't know the Colts were running or passing. Well, this year it seems like the Colts will be passing, particularly early in the year. So while Manning will throw a lot, experience has proven that Manning throws a lot of picks in that situation and often looks very mortal. He'll still put up numbers, but they may not be big ones. A second or third round pick, and you ought to seriously consider if another player is more valuable in those rounds.

    Marvin Harrison will still get his. I wouldn't expect a ton of breakout games, but he should get plenty of catches. If you can get him in the 3rd round you ought to be okay. He's low-risk cause he'll get the ball, and even if he has a "bad" season he won't underperform his draft position by much.

    Reggie Wayne is a wildcard. I'd be tempted to reshuffle my draft board to pick him early. This might even be the year he outperforms Harrison. I'd say if Harrison goes off the board, wayne will follow within the next 10 picks or so. I'd love to get him as a #2, but that might be hard to manage without some draft-day luck.

    Domanick Rhodes is a pretty good RB. But I think we'll see rookie Joseph Addai get a lot of press since he's the highly touted rookie. But Rhodes is a known quantity who has shown he can carry the load when necessary. Unless Addai looks like the starter in camp, I wouldn't be afraid to spend a mid-round pick on Rhodes. The odds are good he could put up fantasy starter numbers, and he'll almost certainly be underestimated on draft-day.

    Joseph Addai is intriguing because we know how well a RB can do for the Colts. We'll see. I tend to think James and Faulk were exceptional talents -- and I don't know that Addai really is. If I had to bet now, I'd say Rhodes is a better overall pick. Scooping up Addai as a backup is the sort of move that could pay off big, even if it's more probable it doesn't pay off much at all. I'd try to get him as a #4 RB.

    Dallas Clark. Yet another pretty good TE. He's not going to put up eye-popping numbers, but he should certainly get the chance to out-peform his draft slot and maybe crack the top 5.

    Brandon Stokley is a good late pickup. He'll probably have the stats to justify the occasional spot start, and an injury could elevate his propsects significantly.

    Jim Sorgi. It's become a joke how little this guy has played. But if the Colts become more of a throw-first offense, I think this is the year Manning really sees pressure and is likely to miss time. I don't know if that merits a Sorgi draft pick, but he's worth remembering and probably worth a pick if you have Manning.

    Posted Jul 17 2006, 01:05 PM by MikeB with 5 comment(s)
    Filed under: ,
  • Notes, Fantasy Preview - AFC North Part II

    For what it's worth, PFT's preseason rankings does not feature the Browns in the bottom 10 teams. They've got the Browns at #22 and state: "Of course, Browns fans should be happy with the team's preseason position." That seems about right to me. Go read it for yourself and see generally positive comments.


    I think ESPN should try to get part of the English Premier League package when its contract comes up and make a concerted effort to build the profile of the Champions League.
    Two words: Heck yeah. ESPN shoves all kinds of crappy sporting events down our throats. How about shoving something insanely great into a 100 million+ homes? Heck, if they were smart the Premier + Champions League would damn near give the US broadcasting rights away for a year as it would certainly lead to giant broadcasting deals in the years to follow.


    Gil Brandt gives evidence that, even though the Browns ought to be "better,"
    they shouldn't expect anything resembling good pub.


    It's sort of amazing that no post-wreck pictures of Ben Roethlisberger have surfaced. Probably because he looks just fine. Of course, it's more entertaining to see photos of Ben chugging beers.


    Speaking of chugging beers, I'd suggest to anyone who's a combination drinker/runner to check out the
    race Saturday evening at the downtown Winking Lizard. Ought to be a good time. Hermes reports there will be 2500+ people there. And the 4-mile course crosses both the Lorain-Carnegie and Detroit-Superior bridges, a pretty cool thing for a nice summer night.


    Fantasy preview... AFC North Part II and everyone's favorite's...

    CLEVELAND BROWNS
    Don't look to our heros to win your fantasy league. If the Browns are competitive this year it will be because the defense shows improvement, the running game is north of average, and Frye only has to make 4-5 big plays a game. That doesn't mean there's nothing of interest here. Just that you should strongly resist the temptation to draft a Brown before his time.

    There's a lot to like here though. The defense has gotten a nice immediate boost in veterans Ted Washington and Willie McGinest, while the team drafted potential mainstays in LBs Wimbley, D'Quell Jackson, and Leon Williams as well as NT Babatunde Oshinowo. If a guy like Brodney Pool emerges as a solid starter this defense could look pretty good. On offense, the big news was replacing Jeff Faine with LeCharles Bentley and LJ Shelton with Kevin Shaffer. The return of Kellen Winslow offers great promise. Charlie Frye appears to be set to build upon a nice rookie season. And as the season wears on, Braylon Edwards will return to a receiving core now headed by the underrated Jurevicius. And Droughns seems poised to have his best pro opportunity. There are a lot of "ifs", and they won't all go as hoped, but none of them are longshots either. Fantasy-wise, Droughns leads the pack, and no one other player leaps out as a huge breakout candidate. Instead, several Browns players will be good fantasy depth or good for the occasional spot start.

    Charlie Frye had, on the whole, a very good rookie campaign. He showed poise, pretty good decision making, great instincts, and knack to go for the big play when a chance was there. In many ways, he appears to be the anti-Couch. But he also showed that there are definite limits on his physical abilities, mainly his arm strength, and he still has to absorb the complexities of NFL quarterbacking. It should be a interesting experiment to see whether guts will triumph over pedigree. I wouldn't bet against him, but can he put up numbers? Certainly he is no fantasy starter. He's not proven enough to even be a sure #2. But he's probably the best #3 to be found and shows more promise in 2006 than just about any highly touted draft pick of recent years. Frye will likely start the season modestly and, if all goes well, could grow into a decent statistical performer by mid-season. Which puts him maybe into the bottom of a fantasy draft and the sort of guy you have on your roster in the off chance he really blossoms.

    Reuben Droughns, despite some concerning off the field stuff this offseason, is likely to be the undisputed go-to guy at RB. And that's a pretty good thing with an improved offensive line. As long as Frye performs capably Droughns should have a nice season along the lines of 1300 yards and 8-9 TDs. He'll probably see fewer overall carries than in 2005, but look better down the stretch. He could wind up with a few hundred yards more. The biggest concerns are 1) whether off the field stuff has a negative effect, and 2) whether someone else (Vickers?) gets carries down by the goalline. I'd say both are pretty unlikely. As it stands, Droughns is a good #2 back and could go in the 3rd or 4th, though in league's not filled with Browns fans he may last a round or two longer and be a pretty good deal.

    Kellen Winslow ought to be a popular guy for pre-draft roundtables. He could go fairly high (middle rounds) if you've got an enthusiastic owner in your leauge. But I think there are too many good tight end prospects in the NFL for Winslow to do any better than the 7th-9th TE off the board, and perhaps not even that high. How will he do? Who knows? There's an abundance of good vibes at the moment, and it seems reasonable to expect Winslow to have the best year of any Browns TE since '99. But that doesn't necesarily equate to fantasy worthiness. I'm thinking 600 yards and 4-5 TDs would be great. But no one knows since so much depends on his health, how the offense is structured, and how Frye is able to find him. It's not that far-fetchd to imagine an offense where Frye looks to Jurevicius as his dependable WR and looks to Winslow for big plays. But that is merely the most optimistic of many possible outcomes. Me, I'm modest in my hopes and wouldn't be inclined to pick Winslow until many other guys are off the board, or perhaps after I've snagged a top-shelf TE and feel happy enough with my team's depth to be the first to burn a pick to make a calculated gamble on on Winslow. And frankly, Browns fans should be happy if Winslow is decent and gives opposing defenses something to legitimately worry about. 10th round or later.

    Joe Jurevicius is clearly the most likely WR to have a fantasy impact. He might be the only one. He'll almost certainly lead the team in receptions, yardage and TD. But that may only mean 900 yards and 5-6 TDs. I'd pick him as a 4th receiver, maybe a 3rd since he'll certainly get the opportunity to do some damage. He doesn't have a real explosive upside but could certainly turn out to be a consistent scorer as a #2 receiver. It depends how you like your fantasy players -- do you gamble on guys who can bust out with the big games or value the guy who always puts up decent, if not spectacular, numbers? Most teams should have a bit of both.

    Braylon Edwards. Late round pick to stash on IR. Maybe he contributes something for the fantasy playoff run, but 2-3 months is a long time to keep dead weight on the roster. He might be worth it, but he might also need to get dropped to waivers if your roster needs the flexibility. Thus, Edwards is a flyer for the latest rounds or a free agent pickup. Most likely, you can let some other owner pick him prematurely. And scoop him off waivers later in the season and gamble with house money.

    Northcutt, Frisman, Green, Wilson, Cribbs, are all role players. Don't pick them. Maybe consider signing them for a brief period if they find themselves in the starting lineup and matchups look favorable. That's it.

    Lee Suggs is in the above category, but he's at least shown some ability to be a fantasy performer if he 1) is healthy and 2) was the starter. If that ever happens he'd be a very nice free agent pickup. Those are two big ifs, however. He could get traded as well, so that could change his value too. PITTSBURGH STEELERS
    They won the Super Bowl. It's still painful to think about this fact, even for someone who has a lot of respect for the Steelers. There's not reason to expect the Steelers to drop off this season, and in some ways we can expect better fantasy production since the losses of Bettis and Randle El may mean the offense has to flow through fewer players. But more than anything you can count on the defense to be at least as good as 2005. They've basically lost no players and this year I think some of their younger players in the defensive backfield are ready to make an impact.

    Ben Roethlisberger continues to improve. His size, mobility, and arm strength are there. And Ben has proven he's got a fire in his belly and can often rise to the occasion of the game at hand. But still looks Couch-esque to me at times and has a tendency to middle his way through some games, so expect some inconsistency. I expect the Steelers to throw a bit more this season since they won't have Bettis to fall back on, so Roethlisberger's yardage will improve. For fantasy purposes, Roethlisberger is still a backup. Even if he scores top 10 overall, odds are he'll have too many unimpressive games to rely on. I'd recommend drafting later, somewhere in the 8th-10th round depending on how your draft plays out. And if someone else jumps aboard sooner, so be it.

    Hines Ward has been a solid fantasy #1 WR for several years now despite playing for a run/defense-centric team. He's able to put up the numbers because when the Steelers don't throw, they still managed to get Ward enough touches. Part of the reason is because he's a great blocker and never leaves the field. This year Ward will garner a bit more attention from defenses. He'll still get his numbers. But I think his ceiling is more or less maxxed out. He should be a top WR, but not more than a late 3rd pick. Ideally you can get him in the 4th or 5th after he's passed over by some other teams. The thing with Ward is you may not get too many really big scoring games. If you pick him as your #1, you're probably going to want to go hunting for a couple potential gamebreakers at WR later in the draft.

    Cedrick Wilson, Santonio Holmes, Quincy Morgan. I don't expect much from any of these guys. Wilson will have the occasional good game. Holmes might blosson into a good player and could pick up some punt-return scores, though he looks like an idiot off the field. Morgan, well, I just threw him in there for entertainment purposes. Draft Holmes very late if the draft is getting boring.

    Heath Miller is a good tight end prospect. He's not going to be a top 3 TE but he stands a decent shot of being top 10, maybe top 5 if he's fortunate. While he had a good rookie season, Miller now appears well positioned to take advantage of the departure of Randle El, the retirement of Bettis, and the development of Roethlisberger. You don't want to draft him as your only option, but he could start and has a big upside.

    Willie Parker is fast, plays behind a good offensive line, and will get the ball plenty. What's not clear is whether he can handle carrying the load for a full year and whether he's good enough to get tough yards inside. Despite the Steelers penchant for running the ball, don't draft Parker as anything more than a 3rd or 4th RB. He'll likely splite time with Staley too, so who knows. If Parker winds up being the man, he's a pretty decent #2 guy.

    Duce Staley is coming back, and reports are rather encouraging. Staley could give the ground game some muscle, and take away short-yardage carries from Parker in the process. I don't see any way Staley could emerge as a viable fantasy candidate unless Parker goes down and Staley is playing very well. Could happen, but if it hasn't happened by draft day I'd look elsewhere first.

    Verron Haynes is not draftable. But he's the likely guy to get lots of carries if Parker is hurt since Haynes appears to be a better overall back than Staley. That's more my opinion than a fact. But keep it in mind as the season progresses and rosters get rearranged.

    Posted Jul 12 2006, 04:17 PM by MikeB with 6 comment(s)
    Filed under: ,
  • Notes, Fantasy Preview - AFC North Part I

    The story out about Ravens LB Roderick Green getting stabbed at a bowling alley sounds sort of incomplete. People usually don't get stabbed after merely bumping into another person. There has to be more to things than that.


    So Ben Roethlisberger is only the
    5th QB drafted in the first-round to win a Super Bowl. Unless I am missing somebody since 1999, anyway.


    As I read random news stories that "Team X Come to Terms With [Insert Rookie Here]" it repeatedly occurs to me -- why is this news? Each year only a handful of non-first-rounders don't sign before camp, and of all the holdouts very few of them merit much consternation. The news headlines in July ought to just say, "The Things That Are Supposed To Happen Are Happening, As Usual." Besides, what choice does a player have? What middle-round pick in his right mind would hold-out from camp?


    Every year the baseball season completely wipes away the storylines from the previous year. This year, Kenny Rogers is starting the All-Star game. What was he doing last year at this time?


    Re: Zinedine Zidane.
    “We are just human beings, our duty is not to judge, our duty is to understand,” Algerian president Abdelaziz Bouteflika said.
    Maybe this sounds a little, uh, judgemental, but I disagree strongly. What Zidane did was incredibly pathetic and dissappointing. No matter what was said to Zidane, headbutting an opponent in overtime of the WORLD CUP FINAL is completely unacceptable. It should be rejected in no uncertain terms. This business about not judging implcitly says that there could be a plausible explanation. But there isn't. Zidane let his whole team, his whole country down. He could just as easily have met the guy in the parking lot after the game (metaphorically speaking), or waited 20 minutes and decked the dude after the shootout, or at least taken the guy down a bit too aggresively while actually making a play on the field. But he instead sacrificed his team's hopes in the biggest game in the world. That's sad. And now do you think anyone in Italy cares that their defender might have said something offensive to Zidane? Heck no.


    Continued fantasy team-by-team blather. On to the AFC North...

    BALTIMORE RAVENS
    It's a shame that this team even exists, but we have to set this aside come fantasy football time. The Ravens come into 2006 with that is assumed is still a very good defense and will try again for an improved offense. Some new additions on offense would seem to increase the odds that might actually happen.

    Steve McNair had been rumored to be going to the Ravens for months and it has finally happened. This move, football-wise, is a good gamble. Sure, McNair has been getting injured at an alarming rate as he's gotten older. But for a team desperate to get decent QB play McNair was the best option available. He doesn't scramble for yardage anymore, but he's smart and tough and difficult to sack. Those are all things previous Raven QBs were not. Fantasy-wise, however, his injury risk is too great to bank on him, and the unknowns with the Raven's offense are plenty. But he's a decent gamble for a back-up. I look at this this way: the Raven's offensive line is considered weak and the running game should be just good enough not to suck. But the Raven's will often be forced to rely on McNair's arm. And his receivers are overall as good or better than what he had in Tennessee. He could put up some numbers while he's healthy. But, of course, the Raven's will still suck.

    Derrick Mason is reunited with McNair and that will greatly help his stats. Mason never has quite reached fantasy-lock status, but he was on his way a couple years ago. A 1,000 yard, 6-7 TD season is not unreasonable to expect. But he might not get the ball quite enough. That makes him an okay 2nd receiver, but his performance is sure to vary from that expectation.

    Mark Clayton hold promise. He looked good last year even with Boller. He could wind up being the #1 guy on the Ravens. If you can get him as a bench player, pick him up; he's shown enough promise to really pay off and perhaps be a starter. Just don't draft too early. This is still the Ravens we are talking about, and you can't be sure McNair will be under center.

    Jamal Lewis is washed up. Sure, I guess he can suprise, and in a way he's playing for one last big payday. But he looked slow in 2005, and not at all hungry. He's likely to be picked too high in drafts. He should be a 4th RB, maybe a 3rd in a pinch. If you draft him you are really banking on the Ravens to exceed expectations and play like the Ravens of 2002-2004.

    Mike Anderson always plays well when he gets the chance. I think he'll get some chances in Baltimore. The playing time is a gamble, but it wouldn't surprise me if Anderson emrged as the primary guy. He on't put up big numbers but they will be good, and if you can draft him as your 4th RB and he winds up a 2nd or 3rd, then that is great value.

    Todd Heap is, for my money, among the best NFL tight ends and would put up much more impressive stats on a better team. Well, Heap might be the biggest beneficiary of Steve McNair. And best of all, Heap is unlikely to be drafted very high since in 2006 there are a lot of promising tight ends. If you lay low I think you can get Heap in the 9th or so round. If you pick a TE early, Heap is a great plan B who could wind up being pretty valuable in a trade.

    Defense. Still a popular pick, but the glory days are gone. They'll probably have their moments, and it could come together since there is still a lot of talent here. But it will require N'Gata to be an immediate force, among other things. But I wouldn't draft them higher than the last couple rounds when the Ravens D looks better than whatever other options are there.

    CINCINNATI BENGALS
    Kind of like the Ravens, this team presents some interesting challenges because you don't know if Palmer will really play. My guess is he won't play until mid-season, and he won't be 100%. In fact, I think the Bengals are gambling way too much on Palmer's recovery and are threatening their entire season when you consider the team does not have a competent backup to speak of (Anthony Wright). Which means all other Bengals are a risk. Not to mention it seems like Marvin Lewis is collecting jackasses on the roster.

    Carson Palmer says he'll be ready. Maybe he will be. But I find it hard to believe, unless the team is okay with him playing on a weak knee. That just spells trouble. If healthy, Palmer would be a top 10, perhaps top 5 QB. As it stands now, he's knocked down 5-6 spots in my book. If he falls far enough in the draft, sure snatch him up. If he looks totally healthy in the preseason then move him back up towards the top of your list. But I wouldn't pay retail for Palmer this year.

    Chad Johnson has been among the best, most consistent #1 receivers the last few years. I think he will continue to be. Even if Palmer goes down again he will get the ball, perhaps even more so. His cockiness always seems to threaten to become destructive, but never has. He'll go late 2nd - mid 4th. I'd lean towards the later end of that scale, but there are few guys I'd want ahead of him.

    Rudi Johnson is, at worst, a decent starter. Because Rudi is not explosive or a speedster he tends not to get much fantasy hype. But he stands to get the ball 20+ times a game and score 10+ TDs, and there's not many RBs as certain to see the ball. Plus, the Cincinnati offensive line is good. Chris Perry looms as a backup who could suck away some playing time, so you can't overpay for Johnson. But there's a good chance Johnson will provide #1 running back stats for a #2 running back draft position. Expect lots of good (not bad, not great) games from Johnson.

    TJ Houshmandzadeh is a decent #3 or #4 fantasy wide out if a healthy carson Palmer is playing, so draft accordingly. Even if Palmer is not all there, Houshmandzadeh is worth a later-round pick because there's definite upside here -- he's been getting better each season and there's always a chance that will continue.

    Chris Perry has played decent when given the chance. So far there's been no sign Rudi Johnson is going to be unseated. But Perry stands to benefit if the opportunity presents himself. That makes him a very good depth selection. In fact, I'd venture to say that it's calculated gambles like Perry that, with a lucky bounce here or there, can pay off big time for a fantasy team.

    Aaron Schobel is a decent tight end and a good receiver. But the Bengals offense doesn't feature the tight end, and frankly there are not enough balls for a guy like Schobel to make a big fantasy impact. The best he can hope is for a 40 yards a game and a TD every few weeks. He's not worth drafting, but he might be a guy to keep an eye on for a spot start or whatever.

  • Notes, AFC East Fantasy Preview Part II

    Great topic in the Cooler about why we fans bought into the Butch Davis regime. Read it for yourself, but I think the answers are pretty simple:
    1. We in Cleveland were beyond desperate for a decent football team. 1995-1998 were horrendous. 1999-2000 were, in a way, even worse because it was clear how far away we still were.
    2. 2001 was the most entertaining Browns season, chock full of close losses and improbable victories. And it was probably so much fun because the expectations couldn't have been lower. And everyone excused the sudden surge of attitude on the roster since it was replacing something even worse -- apathy.
    3. 2002 was a dream come true. Our QB played alternately horrible and quite well. William Green emerged as the season went on. And a few decent free agent signings made a noticable difference on run defense. Butch wasn't unquestioned during this time and there were incidents of serious criticism popping up, but winning felt so good I don't think anyone cared the Browns were obviously the worst 9-7 team in the AFC.
    Of course, 2003 the season was out of control seemingly moments after Tommy Maddox rallied the Steelers to beat the Browns in the 2002 playoffs. Davis stumbled so many times in attempting to manage the QB situation that merely calling him incompetent was giving him too much credit. And the poor personnel decisions really started ravaging the team. Davis' lame excuse for cutting guys like Earl Holmes (that he was a salary cap casualty) was the first mortal blow to his credibility since it was, after all, Butch Davis who signed those guys only a year prior.

    Looking back, I think the only regret anyone should have is that Davis wasn't let go after 2003. It was clear he was leading the team the wrong direction, but Lerner felt compelled to give Davis enough rope to hang himself after Policy left. It's too bad though, because 2004 was a terrible season, full of uninspired play and terrible football. Even the attitude of 2001 was long gone.



    I'm still bumming that Jay Fielder has signed with the Bucs. Now what? It is what it is. We go with Dorsey. We keep Testeverde's number handy. And we pray to god Frye doesn't get hurt and have to miss significant time. This seems like a rather unwise plan to me.


    Ahmad Brooks -- I'd be more interested in this guy if he hadn't had such a history of not focusing on football. That's not even the same thing as "character issues." I like good character but let's face it -- the NFL is full of head cases and the like. But you don't succeed if you are a head case who doesn't put football first. That's what Ahmad Brooks sounds like from the various media reports I've read. Of course, the browns have brought him in for a visit to personally kick the tires, so perhaps they will feel differently. If I had to bet, though, I don't think the Browns take him in the supplemental draft.


    Grossi
    speculates on Tags retiring, some major issues he's dealt with, and a possible replacement. None of this is news, of course, but there are a few nuggets within:
    • Los Angeles. Grossi says this is the big issue for the NLF and a new commish. That's off. Does anyone in L.A. care about having their own team? How is Los Angeles a winning proposition for the NFL? There's a lot of stuff that doesn't add up about this, and it surely comes down to money -- I suspect owners want an L.A. franchise because they think it will boost the value of their own teams, even if it does little for the league's actual revenues.
    • Grossi quote Ravens owner Steve Bisciotti: "(Tags) certainly treated Cleveland losing a team differently than [Rozelle] treated Baltimore losing a team. If Paul would have desired to stop a team going to Cleveland, I'm sure he could've done that." The impression I'm left with is that Bisciotti would like that fact to bolster the Raven's legitimacy. Whatever. It's water under the bridge but it's irksome to watch the player involved bend the history as they see fit.



    NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS

    Last year, the fact that the defense had been weakened and that Corey Dillon was showing his age meant that Tom Brady predicatably had a huge year. But no other offensive player was fantasy-starter worthy. This year, expect the defense to come back into form a bit, and the running game to get a boost.

    Tom Brady. In most scoring systems he finished last year as the 3rd rated passer. I expect him to have another good year, but while the team will probably be a bit better I think it will come somewhat at Brady's expense; in other words, they'll run the ball more. But I'd still draft Brady as the 3rd-5th QB in a draft because he's so consistent. Also, the addition of Maroney might be a boon to Brady's numbers if Maroney proves to be as good a receiver as expected.

    Corey Dillon. Somebody will draft him as a starter, but I'd try not to. Even with good off-season press about how he is recommitted, you can't fully outrun age in the NFL, and the Pats just got help at RB. That means less carries for Dillon. It might not hurt his TD totals, but certainly the yardage won't be there. To me, he's an overvalued fantasy backup who's primary worth is as trade bait to another owner.

    Deion Branch. In general, the Pats receivers are not consistent scorers since Brady spreads the ball around so well. Branch is obviously the best of the bunch and the only one you should rely on for regular scoring. But he's a #2, or a guy you swap in and out of the lineup depending on matchups.

    Chad Jackson. Highly touted rookie will start behind Reche Caldwell on the depth chart. He's worth a very late draft pick or worth a roster spot during the early season to see how th ings play out. But more likely he'll make a better mid-season waiver pickup as injuries and experience result in more playing time. I would let someone else draft (and drop) him, then consider.

    Lawrence Maroney. Who knows. Odds are he won't get the ball quite enough to be worth playing. But he can run and catch and would seem to be a great fit. If Dillon gets hurt or looks washed up, Maroney could get more and more playing time. I'd say drafting him as a 5th RB is worth a gamble since it could pay off big. Would you rather have him or, say, LenDale White? I'd probably prefer Maroney. Still, it's a risk since the capable Kevin Faulk is a similar RB and a veteran. Maroney may have to really light it up.

    Daniel Graham or Ben Watson. If you didn't have to choose between the two, the Pats TE would be an attractive value. But because these guys are both decent receivers I wouldn't count on either, especially for an entire season.

    Martin Gramatica. This move got zero publicity but could be interesting. Like almost all kickers, he's not a sure thing. But you should be aware he's on the Pats when you decide to make a choice in the kicker crapshoot.

    Reche caldwell. Not worth a draft pick, but a guy to put on the short list for a spot start or as an injury replacement. NEW YOUR JETS

    My first impression is that the 2006 is where fantasy teams will go to die. Who is going to score? Who is even on this team anymore? Will any offseason additions make in impact this season? And the QB question could really dog this team.

    Chad Pennington Yeah, I guess he could suprise and actually play, but Pennington was not a very good fantasy QB save for a month or two in 2004 (or was it 2003)? With all his injury issues to overcome I'd rank his prospects among the lowest for the upcoming season.

    Curtis Martin is still worth picking and owning. Until he shows signs of slowing I'd still draft him as a 3rd or even a borderline 2nd running back. The problem here is that the Jets OL was horrible in 2005, and could remain a liability until some newly drafted guys get some experience.

    Laveraneous Coles. A good, explosive wide out. But he doesn't have the size or strength to consistently have big games, especially with a weak-armed QB, which makes him a questionable fantasy starter. He could be good value if he stays on the board too long, but don't put yourself in a position where you are counting on him for production.

    Justin McCareins. What to expect here? I'd say not much. McCareins has yet to have a fantasy worthy season and really hasn't even had many noteworthy games. Going to the Jets brings the positibility he may flourish under a new system, but the Jets' situation has too many question to spend anything other than a very late draft pick on McCareins.

    Patrick Ramsey. I know, why would he be notable? Well, you shouldn't draft him, but he's a potentially decent guy who is likely to see significant playing time. Just keep him in mind. The NFL has a weird way of making success stories out of bad teams, and fantasy starters out of their QBs. See Josh McCown in 2005, for a month or two anyway.

    Mike Nugent. The team probably won't give him enough chances to make a fantasy impact. If he got enough attempts I think you'll see him become a fantasy option. I suppse if the Jets defense is strong Nugent may get enough tries, and many from long distance. More of a 1st or 2nd week waiver pickup than anyone you'd draft.

    Posted Jul 07 2006, 09:13 AM by MikeB with 4 comment(s)
    Filed under:
  • One Bum Shoulder, Fantasy Preview - AFC East Part I

    If I am not mistaken, this Sunday was the first time all year that the PD had zero articles on the Browns. Sure, there was the obligatory "Hey Tony!" blurb that never yeidls anythig interesting, but that was it. Yep, it's vacation time for NFL reporters. In 2005 this wasn't too big of a deal. But this year, with the Indians treading water, these weeks or silence are tougher to take.


    I think, if I was Tim Couch, that I'd be more concerned with getting my shoulder back just so it can function normally in everyday life than I would be worried about making a comeback in football. Think about it: I don't know how much money Couch made in Cleveland, but it was over 20 million. Which means he ought to have at least 10-15 million in investments and real estate. Which means he can reasonably expect to make more each year in interest and appreciation than he could expect to make as a backup in the NFL. Move on, be happy.


    Fantasy Football rumblings: Every day or two or three I'm gonna go team by team and give some random thoughts. MIAMI DOLPHINS: I'm a big skeptic regarding Nick Saban and his "new regime" in Miami. I don't think the previous coaches there were all that incompetent, and I don't think Saban is a miracle worker. The fact that the Dolphins are rumored to be seriously interested in just about every single available free agent is laughable, especially when press reports say stuff like the Dolphins under Saban are now interested in "atheltic" players. What the hell is that supposed to mean? But I digress...

    The Dolphins represent a big challenge for fantasy. New coach, new schemes, new QB, and a semi-new starting RB. There are a lot of questions outstanding, but the reward could be big. In general, I'd say Dolphins players should be calculated risks for fantasy players.

    Dante Culpepper. I could be seriously wrong on this, but I am just not a big believer that Culpepper is both healthy and a very good QB. He looked terrible last year playing without Moss. Under no circumstances would I bank on Culpepper to be your starting QB.

    But even a skeptic like me see the potential here. Culpepper is a guy who can't play "not to lose" because then he surely will. He's a guy who has to play to win and attack a defense. That might not be a great recipe for consistent success for an NFL team, but it's nice for fantasy football. Saban would be an idiot not to take advantage of what Culpepper can do. So hopefully the offense will be tailored so Culpepper can succeed.

    Culppeper will certainly have the tools. The ground game should be decent with Ronnie Brown. He'll have a great receiver in Chris Chambers who he can throw the ball to when he's not sure what else to do. Tight end Randy McMichael is a great safety-net target. And Culppeper will likely pick up a few rushing TDs. Basically, the talent is there for Culpepper to outperform his draft position.

    And the draft position is key. If you can drat Culpepper as your backup, perhaps in the 7th or 8th round, he's worth the gamble. If the Dolphins start strong you can ride Culpepper, or trade him off and get great value in return. If you draft him as your starter, plan on selecting another start-worthy QB in the next round or two.

    Ronnie Brown. Some drafts suggest he's a top 5 running back. I think that's high. I think he's top 15 with some additional risk+potential. I don't think he's a top 10 drat selection, but he won't last through the end of round 2. He's a good runner and an okay receiver. But most importantly the Dolphins don't have another RB to threaten him. My only concerns are the fact that Culpepper (when playing well) leads scoring drives that often end in a long TD pass or a QB scramble for a score. So there's some doubt in my mind that Brown can scroe enough TDs to really be an elite fantasy guy. I think ideally you pair Brown on a roster with a somewhat safer pick.

    Chris Chambers. This is the year for Chambers -- he'll either be a top 10 WR or he'll forever be a 2nd receiver. I expect Culppeper to throw depp to him often and he'll get every chance to have a big year. I wouldn't draft him to be a sure-thing #1 wide-out because you don't know how Culpepper will play and if the consistency will be there, but he's a good pick to be picked as sort of a 1-slash-2 guy and still outperform his draft position. I think a 4th or 5th round pick would be about right.

    Randy McMichael. Off-the-field behavior aside, McMichael has been very good and should continue. The problem is there are 1) a lot of promising tight ends this year so you don't want to overpay, and 2) Culpepper doesn't have a great history with tight ends. He should probably be the 5th-8th TE off the board, which puts him in the 8th round or so.



    BUFFALO BILLS: This team is pretty hosed. There's no quarterback back to speak of now, and there's no hope for one to emerge. Why this team didn't pick Vince Young is beyond me. But there are a couple fantasy-worthy considerations here.

    Willis McGahee. A top 15 back. But I'd be careful here. McGahee will almost certainly end the season with decent stats but you're unlikely to get rock-solid, weekly scoring. I've read that the Bills will make more of an effort to get McGahee to the outside instead of running between the tackles so much, but I'm skeptical that it can translate into consisten stats. That sort of approach seems more likely to make McGahee more inconsistent. Anyway... I wouldn't draft McGahee for anything more than a second running back, and if I did I'd be scouting out for a 3rd and 4th who could possibly replace him in my starting lineup at times.

    Lee Evans. A lot of publications describe Evans as a "frustrating" fantasy guy, b he's only been frustrating for people who counted on the Bills when they shouldn't have. In my eyes, he's consistently outperformed my modest expectations and has been a great 4th or 5th WR who you can occasionally gamble on. The question is will he improve on this status in 2006? I'm guessing he won't because the QB situation is bad, and the o-line situation might be worse. Late in the draft he's worth a pick though, as he's almost certain to have a good run or two of impressive games.

    Peerless Price. What a joke this is. I'm mentioning him only to say "stay away." Really, there is no point to drafting him, but if someone else does that's fine with me.

    Kelly Holcomb/JP Losman I wouldn't draft either, but Holcomb might be worth a chance if only because he can lead an offense through the air when need be. And, although it'd be like hitting the lotto, perhaps he can avoid injuries long enough to play well for a season. Still, he is borderline draftable and you'd probably be better off with a good team's backup QB than anyone who will start for the Bills.



    The Indians won 4 of 6 on their recent trip through St. Louis and Cincinnati. Only their two losses were games they clearly should have won, and they were blown in spectacular fashion on some ugly errors and a ninth inning, walk off grand slam. In fact, those might have been the two most painful losses of the season, and it's hard to be positive after watching those games.

    But the team is playing better. The starting pitching has been pretty good. And the team is hitting even with Michaels (who's a pretty good hitter, I think) and Blake still out. It's pretty much gut check time now. The Tribe has to get close to .500 by the all-start break. And that means winning 5 of 7 games over the next week. I'll admit, it's not looking good to be able to do that, and it'd be a long, improbable road after that to contend for the playoffs. But I'll wait until the All-Star break before relgating the 2006 Indians to also-ran status.



    On the headphones today:
    • Sonic Youth - Washing Machine. This was a not-so-good release from SY. But really, it's got 4 or so pretty good cuts. Like most SY records, it makes me wonder what it would have been like if they re-recorded this record while corraled in a studio by a pop producer. I heard their new record is "pop" songs. I'll have to check that out.
    • Black 47. Miscellaneous songs. I don't know if this band is still around (they are!), but it they live on pretty well in the music. And they definitely got that time+place thing down as I'm instantly transported to the mid-nineties in Manhattan and the Bronx. Of course, I never saw them, but it's too easy to imagine. Ah, good times. And there's something gloriously naive about those righteous Irish "rap" songs.
    • Beta Band. These guys came and went without releasing enough music. But what they did release was, for the most part, extremely memorable and pretty cool. I've been listening to them a bit recently while running cause the songs are 1) long, 2) wildly different and creative, 3) rhythmic. But my memories of this music are more inline with playing console games, drinking beer, and eating junk food while blasting "Dry the Rain" and "Squares" at full volume.



    Happy 4th...
2007 MediaTNG, LLC
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems