in

This Blog

Syndication

News

Blogging the Cleveland Browns plus other Cleveland-area blather, plus other blather about other things.

Dawghouse Blog

Blogging the Cleveland Browns plus other Cleveland-area blather, plus other blather about other things.

8 Reasons for Trent Green

He's easily the best "available" veteran QB. There are plenty of reports that Green is both available for a low-round draft pick AND willing to renegotiate his contract to a fairly modest amount for a starting QB.

It's clear that Charlie Frye is not going to be the starting QB of the Browns in 2007. I thik he could have a nice career as a backup where he could both develop and be a good off-the-bench threat when called upon. But his physical skills won't ever allow him to be a consistently good starter. Most notably, his accuracy is barely adequate for a college QB -- and that's not going to suddenly improve. I still kind of like Frye and thought he really started off his career here with promise. But I'm resigned to the fact that Frye can't be apocket passer, and you can't win in the NFL with a QB who constantly needs to be moving around to be effective. Jeff Garcia is about the best possible QB of that sort in the NFL, and we've already churned through him. Why push Frye down that same road? At this point I think Frye is very likely to get traded around the draft.

Derek Anderson stands a somewhat better shot. His physical skills are far better than Frye's, and I'm very high on him. I thought last year he showed good decision making and was both poised and competitive. Still, I think he would be suited to be an ideal backup/developmental guy. As a backup I'm very comfortable with Anderson. Someday maybe he could start.

If you assume the Browns draft Quinn or Russell (I'm not doing that), either of those guys ought to sit on the bench for a year. What's the point of being overly aggressive with a prized rookie QB? The Browns can't expect to make the playoffs with a rookie QB.

All of this means that the Browns MUST acquire a veteral QB who is capable of being the starter in 2007. Trent Green is, far and away, the best available guy for this purpose. Freaking go get him already.

Top 8 reasons why Trent Green is a good fit for the Browns:

  1. A bona fide starter now.
  2. Could be the starter for this team in 2008 and 2009 too.
  3. Affordable. Both in trade and in a renegotiated contract.
  4. A high-quality person. He is not going to be frequenting the Warehouse District and dating Playmates.
  5. A good mentor for Anderson, Frye, or a rookie QB.
  6. Throws a very good deep ball. Think Braylon Edwards could thrive on that?
  7. Knows how to use the tight end. Cross your fingers, the Browns have a pretty talented tight end.
  8. A strong argument could be made that the Browns, more than anything else, need steadiness out of their QB. Green brings that.

#3 Pick Order of Preference (running item)

  1. Joe Thomas.
  2. Calvin Johnson.
  3. Trade Down.
  4. Adrian Peterson.
  5. Brady Quinn.
Published Mar 26 2007, 02:03 PM by MikeB
Filed under:

Comments

 

barrymcbride said:

Agree with this... Green would be a smart pick-up given the holes in both Frye and Anderson's games. Let's get Green!

March 26, 2007 4:14 PM
 

vintage74 said:

Green in Orange & Brown...kinda sounds interesting. I bet he wouldn't mind actually having some wide recievers, especially a deep threat (assuming we can get a couple rolls of fly tape to wrap around BE's hands) to throw to. KC hasn't sniffed a decent WR in years.

Don't forget though he won't have LJ behind him to take the pressure off.

March 26, 2007 4:44 PM
 

Mike Bukach said:

Please email your blog to Savage, the Browns bring in a proven leader at QB to mentor the young-ins while still being young enough (37 this year) to be productive for a year or 2, BRILLIANT!

And due to his injury last year, his stock dropped making him cheap this year. Even though since 2002  he was at a consistent 93 QB rating, was at a 62% completion percentage, a 250 yds/game and always + on the td/int ratio.  This may be from LJ's solid production, but besides Gonzales who do the Chiefs have to throw to?

The only questions are

1. why the heck would he want to come here??

2. Assuming we do drop Frye and not Anderson (which I hope would happen) are the Browns forced to draft QB this year @ #3, or do they take the chance of Green staying healthy and Anderson being ready to fill in to draft QB in 08?

March 26, 2007 5:21 PM
 

Moony said:

I like Green, but he's 37 and possibly one concussion away from retirement.  I'm skeptical about the affordable line - if he's so affordable, why is he still a Chief?  Also, Frye/Anderson might not be the long-term answer at QB, but neither is Green.  Plus, our Frye/Anderson know how to use the TE also, Winslow got 89 catches last year, remember?  3 years ago, I would've said get Green.  If we had the "QB of the future" on the team now, I'd say get Green.  But in our current situation and point of Green's career, I say no.

March 27, 2007 6:14 PM
 

Dawg Nuts said:

First of all, even though he doesn't have LJ to take the pressure off of him, he'd have Jamal Lewis.  Not as good as LJ, but effective nonetheless.

Second, even though he's thrown some interceptions in the past, he's less likely to make the big, killer mistakes that Frye has made.  

Bottom line is that Trent Green gives us the best chance we have to win games with what options are currently available.  If concussions are a concern, then we should draft Thomas to solidify this OL.

March 28, 2007 8:58 AM
 

MikeB said:

I am under no illusions that Green would be really good. I'm just looking for competency and a certain amount of steadiness. Green is an established player with well knows strengths and weaknesses. For the Browns, the would be a good thing because we have not had an offensive identity since the team came back. There's been no sense about what the offense does well. At least with Green there will be some sanity -- he can throw an acurate long ball, he can hit guys underneath, he can sell the playaction, and he can check-down when necessary. I'm not sure the Browns have had a QB who could do any of these things consistently.

Yes, the big thing with Green is a fear of another concussion. It's a real possibility, but it's also the reason he's available and will not command a large contract. There's definitely risk involved. But is that risk more or less than the risk of having no legitimate QB on the roster? Or drafting a rookie QB and the only option being to start him in year one?

March 28, 2007 10:30 AM
 

vintage74 said:

Larry Johnson --> 2007 Kenworth, Mint Condition

Jamal Lewis --> 1992 F-150, re-built tranny, leaking oil but it will run for 250,000

March 28, 2007 8:24 PM
 

Yuppie in Khakis & Loafers said:

Does is matter who the QB is behind our line?

March 29, 2007 7:54 PM

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Add
2007 MediaTNG, LLC
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems